6.
17
a territorial enalave.
On the contrary those laws must
as a general rule be respected.
Exceptions to this
obligation exist in the case of acts beginning and
ending on board the ship and taking no effect externally
to her, in all matters in which the economy of the
ship or the relations of persons on board to each other
are exclusively touched".
And again (para 78) "With regard to ships of war
and other public ships little need be said. The fiction
of territoriality is useless, but it is harmless; because
it cannot cause larger privileges to be attributed to such
vessels than they are acknowledged for other reasons to
possess. They represent the sovereignty and independence
of their State more fully than anything else can represent
it on the occan; they can only be met by their equals there,
and equals cannot exercise jurisdiction over equals. The
jurisdiction of their own state over them is therefore
exclusive under all circumstances, and any act of inter-
ference with them on the part of a foreign state is an
act of war".
To the former of those citations the learned author
appends a footnote which is not without significance on
the facts of the case which we are here examining:-
"The case which, however, would be extremely rare
on board a ship of war, of a crime committed by a subject
of the state within which the vessel is lying against a
fellow subject would no doubt be an exception to this. It
would be the duty of the captain to surrender the criminal".
So far as judicial decisions go the first case to be
carefully considered is and always will be The Exchange
(7 Cranch 116).
Wheaton (4th Edition p. 152) summarises the material
portions of the judgment thus:-
"In delivering the judgment of the Court in this case,
Mr. Chief Justice Maraball stated that the jurisdiction
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.